Engagement Designed for Decision Integrity
Where Decision Pressure Increases
MPowr Teams is most valuable at decision inflection points where consequences compound and direction must hold.
Examples include:
• Portfolio prioritization under constrained capital
• Program resets after new clinical or technical data
• IND readiness and regulatory tradeoffs
• Platform versus asset investment decisions
• Scaling commitments, partnerships, or governance shifts
• Any decision where authority, tradeoffs, and risk ownership must be explicit before execution proceeds
The specifics vary. The common factor is consequence.
90–120 minute structural review
Starts at $3500
A focused diagnostic for a decision in play or your broader decision environment.
We examine how authority is defined, how tradeoffs are surfaced, how governance forums sequence decisions, and how closure and revisit conditions are set at the decision transfer boundary.
This session evaluates structure, not technical content.
Duration
Single session + written summary within 5 business days.
You Receive
Concise written summary
Authority and risk carrier mapping
Identified structural pressure points
Recommended stabilization priorities
Best Used When
A material decision inflection point is approaching.
Decisions repeatedly reopen after alignment.
Governance is active but direction still shifts.
Risk signals surface late in execution.
4–8 week engagement
Starts at $18,000 +
Structured intervention at a material decision inflection point before commitment transfers into execution.
We design and facilitate the decision forum with neutral structure, ensuring authority clarity, explicit tradeoffs, assumption exposure, and defined closure and revisit conditions.
The goal is durable transfer into project execution.
Duration
Preparation, stakeholder alignment, facilitated decision forum(s), and documented outputs over 4–8 weeks, aligned to governance cadence.
You Receive
Structured decision session design
Neutral facilitation
Explicit authority and risk alignment
Defined closure and revisit parameters
Documented decision summary
Best Used When
A Go or No-Go carries material consequence.
Leadership alignment feels fragile.
Cross-functional tension is present but unexamined.
Project execution depends on durable clarity.
Initial 8–16 week cycle
Starts at $40,000
System-level reinforcement across projects and portfolio governance layers.
We strengthen how decisions travel across programs, examining authority clarity patterns, reopening frequency, coordination load, and drift clustering at decision transfer boundaries.
The objective is portfolio coherence and sustained decision stability.
Duration
Initial diagnostic and reinforcement cycle over 8–16 weeks, aligned to portfolio review cadence.
Optional ongoing advisory partnership.
You Receive
Cross-program decision stability mapping
Authority and reopening pattern analysis
Identification of systemic drift signals
Structural reinforcement roadmap
Ongoing advisory option
Best Used When
Portfolio momentum feels inconsistent.
Decisions cluster and reopen across programs.
Governance cycles feel heavy but impact unclear.
Coordination load is rising across teams.